Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:03:38 -0400
From: bobhunt@erols.com
Subject: [lpaz-repost] (fwd) [American_Liberty] Modern-day gladiators
To: Individual-Sovereignty@yahoogroups.com, lpaz-repost@yahoogroups.com, MDLP-NEWS@onelist.com


On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:16:46 -0500, Mike Schneider <mike1@usfamily.net>
wrote:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/dougbandow/db20020827.shtml

August 27, 2002

Modern-day gladiators
Doug Bandow

WASHINGTON -- The more government changes, the more it remains the same. The
Roman Empire built the Coliseum and entertained its citizens with
gladiators. Today cities entertain the masses by building stadiums for
baseball and football contests.

Washington, D.C., Mayor Anthony Williams wants to bring professional
baseball to the nation's capital by contributing as much as $200 million
toward a new stadium. A group of northern Virginia businessmen are working
to saddle taxpayers with $100 million to $200 million in costs for a new
baseball franchise.

In fact, more than 30 sports facilities have been built or planned over the
last decade. Last year, 15 baseball and football franchises were asking for
new stadiums.

Obviously, franchise owners prefer that someone else pay. Since Milwaukee
inaugurated the modern gladiatorial era in 1953 by building a stadium to
tempt the Braves to leave Boston, governments have spent more than $20
billion, in current dollars, on sports facilities. According to economist
Alan Krueger, that's 2 1/2 times what the poor, impoverished sports moguls
contributed. Stadium supporters argue that such government "investments"
create jobs. Fred Baranowski, president of the Downtown San Diego
Partnership, even exults that the Padres ballpark project "has stimulated
property values and residential and commercial development interest in a
part of downtown that was dormant for decades."

It is all too good to be true. Public finance experts Roger Noll and Andrew
Zimbalist found that "no recent facility appears to have earned anything
approaching a reasonable return on investment and no recent facility has
been self-financing in terms of its impact on net tax revenues."

Baltimore's Camden Yards may be one of the nation's best, but Johns Hopkins
University economist Bruce W. Hamilton figures every city resident
contributes $12 a year toward the stadium's upkeep. And that doesn't include
the revenues that could have been generated from investing people's money
elsewhere. Many facilities are huge financial black holes. In San Diego, the
Padres convinced the city to build them a stadium -- which has been long
held up in litigation -- and then promptly dismantled the team that went to
the World Series. The team later reneged on its promise to build new hotel
and office space, which was supposed to help generate tax revenue to pay off
city bonds.

The Chargers came up with a $68 million renovation project for Qualcomm
stadium. Through revenue-guarantee, city taxpayers effectively buy unsold
seats, which has cost San Diego taxpayers $25 million so far. The Chargers
are now threatening to move to Los Angeles -- unless San Diego builds them a
new stadium, thank you very much. Obviously, stadiums generate economic
activity. But there's no guarantee that they will even help their own
neighborhoods. For instance, Yankee Stadium has not revitalized the Bronx.
And even if they help some local property owners, there are losers. San
Diego's project has boosted rents, driving out many businesses.

Moreover, enriching a few lucky individuals or companies should not be
confused with benefiting the public. Making some people pay so others can
profit is a misuse of government. Especially when the same argument could be
made for subsidizing any business.

Why not build a new factory for General Motors? Or construct buildings for
new restaurants? Even if corporate subsidies were a good thing in theory,
there's no reason to believe that a stadium would be more productive than
other public programs, let alone private projects.

The real economic cost of stadium construction is the "opportuniy cost."
That is, any "investment" has to be measured against the benefits that would
accrue from spending the money elsewhere, whether creating new schools or
providing credit for new entrepreneurs.

Almost every study proclaiming the economic benefits of sports facilities
ignores the impact of siphoning that money out of other activities. As
Hamilton puts it: "You produce jobs working at the stadium, but you reduce
jobs at bars or bowling alleys or clothing stores or wherever else (fans)
would spend their money."

Economists Robert Baade and Allen Sanderson reviewed the experience of 10
cities since 1958 and concluded that adding a stadium had no impact on
employment. Noll and Zimbalist found only "an extremely small effect on
overall economic activity and employment."

The best way for government to promote development is to improve the overall
investment and regulatory climate. True, politicians quail before owners'
threats to move. Yet if the only way to prevent a team from leaving is to
shovel corporate welfare into a billionaire's hands, the proper response,
especially from cities and states in fiscal crisis, is to say no thanks.
Public officials need to remember what government is supposed to be about.
The Roman Empire provided bread, circuses and gladiators to anesthetize its
citizens. The American Republic can and should do better.


------ http://USFamily.Net/info - Unlimited Internet - From $8.99/mo! ------




Evolution beyond the moral and intellectual fraud of politics.

http://groups.yahoo.com/roup/American_Liberty/files/al.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/American_Liberty/files/links.htm

Socialist: 1. one who believes all persons are or should be equal when they
are not and cannot be; if unable to enrich the poor or educate the foolish,
the socialist will settle for impoverishing the wealthy and preventing the
wise from speaking.... 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now
http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/mG3HAA/JdSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Community home page:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/community/lpaz-repost 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/